~ From the desk of RJ Bell ~
Adding to your Bracket IQ
RJ Bell
Pregame.com President
First
comes filling in your brackets. Office pool success is typically
decided by two types of predictions: 1) Picking teams that will go
deep into the tournament; 2) Picking a healthy amount of upsets in
the early rounds.
On the
surface every #1 seed looks strong – that’s why they're top seeds. But
you’re not going to win your pool without scoring with some
surprises. Let’s take a look at how #1 seeds have historically done:
(All
stats are since 1985, the year the Big Dance became a 64 team
tournament. All results are straight up with no consideration for
point spread.)
Number of Final Four teams that were #1 seeds in a given
year:
All 4: zero times
3 of 4: three times
2 of 4: nine times
1 of 4: eight times
0 of 4: zero times
Very
interesting . . . never all four, but never none – one or two 17 of
the last 20 years! Considering that picking upsets wins bracket
pools, the numbers advice advancing only one #1 to the semi-finals in
your bracket.
Which
one? Key fact to consider: Of the 80 Final Four teams in our sample,
26 failed to meet ALL of the following conditions:
+ Made tourney the prior year
+ Had a preseason AP All-American
+ Beat opponents by an average of 10+ points a game.
+ Got at least 30% of scoring from their front court (forwards and
centers)
Stunningly, only 4 of those 26 teams that failed to meet ALL the above
conditions made the Final Four! 30 of 54 teams who did meet these
conditions did make the Final Four!
But
don’t count on #1 seeds falling easily:
80-0 in the 1st round
68 of 80 (85%) make it to the Sweet 16.
56 of 68 (70%) make it to the Elite 8!
In the
Elite 8, #1s are only 20-19 to win that next game to reach the Final
Four when playing a #2 or #3 seeds. When playing any other seed lower
than 3, the #1s have won 14 of 17 games to reach the Final Four.
Of the
222 times top seeds have played #5 seeds or lower, those lower seeds
have won only 21 times (that’s over 90% winners for the #1s when
playing a significantly lower seed)
Which
leads to a key point – seemingly upset worthy #8 and #9 seeds
inevitably must face a #1 in the 2nd round, severely decreasing the
likelihood of advancing as far as even the 3rd round.
#2 seeds
are 76-4 in the 1st round; but #2 are only 16-13 in the 2nd
round vs. #10 seeds.
#3 seeds
are 67-13 in the 1st round – but less than 50% make it to
the 3rd round!
#4 seeds
are 64-16 in the 1st round – but less than 50% make it to
the 3rd round!
At least
one #12 seed has beaten a #5 in the 1st round every year
but one since 1988.
Seeds
#13 or worse win less than 14% of games played, making them extreme
long shot picks to win even a single game.
Which
leaves 10, 11, and 12 seeds as prime Cinderella candidates – when they
win in round 1, these sleepers are a surprising 39-43 to win in the
2nd round and move on to the Sweet 16.
The
Elite 8 is where the big upsets usually end. 26 times in this round
big underdogs (defined by being 4 or more seeds worse) have faced
favorites, winning only 4 times (15%).
Seeds of
80 Final Fours teams of the last 20 years:
#1: 34
#2: 18
#3: 11
#4: 7
#5: 3
#6: 3
#8: 3
#11: 1
88% of
Final Four teams come from the top 3 seeds!
Only once has a lower than #8 made the Final Four!
Of the
last 20 champions, 11 were #1 seeds.
Don’t
believe the myth that the Mid-Major conferences are closing the gap
with the big boys – in the last 5 years, these conferences have:
+ sent less teams to the dance
+ with a lower average seed
+ won a lower percentage of games
than in ANY other 5 year period of the last 20 years.
The gap between the super conferences and mid-Majors is widening.
Important game factors to keep in mind when picking winners:
Experience of both the players and the coach in the Big Dance - The
more the better.
How the
team did on the road during the season – Tournament games are road
games.
Home
court fan advantage for certain teams in certain rounds.
Ignore
bench depth – over the last 5 years, Final Four teams have gotten over
80% of their points from their five starters.
Most
likely upset in round 1 according to our network of experts: #11 UTEP
over #6 Utah.
Never miss another winner from FPBE -
Introducing PhoneAccess! For only
$9.95 a month you get a special phone number to a recorded message of
each day's FPBE picks. Perfect for March Madness with games going day
& night. Click for all the
exciting details. Join now and as an added bonus receive RJ
Bell's top upset pick from each of the four regions and his very top
ATS pick - a $50 value.
With PhoneAccess there's no reason
to miss out on even one winner.
Specific
handicapping factors for NCAA Tourney games will be examined in full
detail in my next article coming on Wednesday . . . As will our list
of over-performing and under-performing coaches . . .
Ring the
cash register in your head,
RJ Bell
rj@fpbe.com
* You can tell a
friend about his interesting info by simply emailing them this link [http://freepicksbyemail.com/news/]
* If you are not yet
a FPBE list-member (or you are but have an alternate email address
that's sometimes better for you) - You can be
added to our FPBE
list quick & free.
|